Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM E. BROWN, Case No. 16-cv-00603-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT

R. AMIS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 74 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 regarding events that transpired at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), where he was previously incarcerated. Now pending before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 74. Plaintiff received a three-month extension of time to file his opposition (Dkt. No. 77), but has filed no opposition and the deadline to do so has passed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motion for summary judgment. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise indicated.1 21 1 On summary judgment, the nonmoving party must identify with reasonable particularity the 22 evidence that precludes summary…