Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v. Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR Case No. 20-CV-00193-LHK
CORPORATION,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
Plaintiff,
DENYING IN PART
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
v.
SEAL
15 FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED, Re: Dkt. No. 7 et al., Defendants. 18 On January 9, 2020, Plaintiff Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (“Cypress”) filed an ex 19 parte application for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (“TRO 20 Application”). ECF No. 8. On the same day, Cypress filed an administrative motion to seal 21 certain exhibits filed in support of Cypress’s TRO Application. ECF No. 7. Pursuant to Civil 22 Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(A), Cypress’s sealing motion is supported by a declaration from Michael R. 23 Headley. ECF No. 7-1 (“Headley Decl.”). 24 For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Cypress’s 25 administrative motion to file under seal.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
27 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents,…