Vietnam Reform Party v. Viet Tan - Vietnam Reform Party

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VIETNAM REFORM PARTY, Case No. 17-cv-00291-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEYS FEES

v. Re: Dkt. No. 107 VIET TAN - VIETNAM REFORM PARTY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 On January 20, 2017, Plaintiff Vietnam Reform Party filed a trademark action against Defendants Viet Tan—Vietnam Reform Party (“VT Corp.”), as well as individuals Nguyen Thanh Tu (“Tu”) and Michelle Duong (“Duong”). Dkt. No. 1. Since then, only Defendant Tu has appeared. See Dkt. No. 50. Defendant Tu and Plaintiff entered into a settlement agreement, and Defendant Tu was dismissed with prejudice from this action. Dkt. No. 84. On January 14, 2019, Plaintiff sought default judgment against the remaining Defendants, VT Corp. and Duong. Dkt. No. 86. On August 26, 2019, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part the motion for default judgment. Dkt. No. 90. Plaintiff now seeks an award of $164,981.00 in attorneys’ fees and $7,140.56 in costs pursuant to…