Warren

Warren v. Anglea

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20203:19-cv-04174California854 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 BERNARD WARREN, BB3793, Case No. 19-cv-04174-CRB (PR)

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR STAY AND

v. ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING

CASE

HUNTER ANGLEA, Warden, (ECF No. 20) Respondent.

13 Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a conviction 14 and nine-year sentence from Sonoma County Superior Court for felony infliction of corporal 15 injury resulting in a traumatic condition on his then-spouse, enhanced for inflicting great bodily 16 injury under circumstances involving domestic violence. In the operative pro se petition, 17 petitioner claims that: (1) trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to properly 18 prepare for the charges and for failing to object to unidentified constitutional violations; (2) trial 19 counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to object to the imposition of the upper-term 20 sentence; and (3) the sentencing court erred by imposing the upper-term sentence. ECF No. 1 at 5. 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.