Woo

Woo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20203:19-cv-07042California275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 TONY WOO, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07042-MMC Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; V. VACATING HEARING AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.,

INC.,

10 Defendant. 11 Before the Court is defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed January 30, 2020,

|| whereby defendant, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil © Procedure, seeks dismissal of plaintiffs' initial complaint. On February 13, 2020, plaintiffs Oo 15 || filed a First Amended Complaint.

Q A party may amend a pleading "once as a matter of course within . . . days after Cc @ 17 || service of a responsive pleading or days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), 18 || (e), or (f), whichever is earlier." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). "[A]n amended pleading 19 || supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent." Bullen v. De 20 || …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.