Laine
Laine v. Superior Court of Alameda County Hayward Hall of Justice
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSHUA LAINE, et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-04390-JD
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION AND
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA FORMA PAUPERIS FOR APPEAL
COUNTY HAYWARD HALL OF
JUSTICE, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 218, 219 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs (“Laine”), who are proceeding pro se, have filed a motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 219, of the order dismissing this case with prejudice, Dkt. No. 216. Laine also appealed that order, Dkt. No. 217, and seeks to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 218. The appeal has been held in abeyance pending resolution of the motion for reconsideration. Dkt. No. 223. I. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DKT. NO. 219) Civil Local Rule 7-9 requires parties to move for leave from the Court prior to filing a motion for reconsideration. Civil L.R. 7-9(a). Substantively, the moving party must show: (1) “a material difference in fact or law exists from that…