Peirow-Salehi

Peirow-Salehi v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20205:19-cv-03039California3,551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAVAD PEIROW-SALEHI, Case No. 19-cv-03039-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 19 Defendant.

Javad Peirow-Salehi (“Plaintiff”) appeals from the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Dkt. 1. For the reasons discussed below, the Court remands this case for further proceedings. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed an application for SSI disability benefits, alleging disability beginning January 1, 2011. Dkt. 13 (Administrative Record (“AR”)) 155-175. An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) held a hearing and issued an unfavorable decision on April 30, 2018. AR 17-25. The ALJ found that Plaintiff had the following severe impairments: back pain/lumbago/low back strain; anxiety/social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.