Jarose

Jarose v. County of Humboldt

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20203:18-cv-07383California3,653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 9 PAMELA JAROSE, executor of the Case No: C 18-07383 SBA

ESTATE OF JOHN R. BRAUN,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, MODIFY THE SCHEDULING

ORDER AND FOR LEAVE TO

vs. AMEND THE PLEADINGS 13 COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, a subdivision Dkt. 31 of the State of California, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Pamela Jarose, executor of the Estate of John R. Braun (the “Estate”), and Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff County of Humboldt (the “County”) sue each other to assign liability and/or recover costs for hazardous waste cleanup at certain real property located in Eureka, California. The parties bring claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Reponse, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., and California’s Hazardous Substances Account Act (“HSAA”), Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25300, et seq., as well as related causes of action. Presently before the Court is the Estate’s Motion to Modify the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.