UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ADVSR, LLC, Case No. 19-cv-02670-JCS
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
MAGISTO LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 60 Defendants.
I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Advsr, LLC alleges in this action that Defendants Magisto Ltd. and Yahal Zilka are liable for claims arising from an acquisition of Magisto after Magisto had entered a consulting contract with Advsr to secure such an acquisition. Magisto has answered Advsr’s complaint, but Zilka now moves under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the two claims against him, for intentional interference with contractual relations and intentional interference with prospective economic relations, for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The Court held a hearing on February 28, 2020. For the reasons discussed below, Zilka’s motion is DENIED.1 II. ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT Because a plaintiff’s factual…