Buller

Buller v. Woodrow

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20205:17-cv-06562California6,088 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

25 A. Plaintiff’s Complaint In the early morning of November 22, 2015, Bryan Buller was driving to his home in the City of Morgan Hill, California. Compl. ¶ 6. Buller claims that when he arrived at a stoplight, he was unaware that a police vehicle was behind him. Compl. ¶ 6. When the police officers turned on their sirens behind him, Buller claims that it was unclear that they were directed toward him because this was near a fire station where there was frequent activity. Compl. ¶ 8. Buller claims that despite there being no indication that he was fleeing, that the officers “executed a risky maneuver and attempted to ram plaintiff’s vehicle by driving in front of him.” Compl. ¶ 9. Buller says he became frightened as a result. Compl. ¶ 9. Because Buller was close to his house, he proceeded to drive home slowly and pulled into his driveway. Compl. ¶¶ 9-10. Buller claims that as soon as he got out of the car, Officers Chris Woodrow and Charles Rudisel, without provocation, began striking and beating him with their hands. Compl. ¶ 11. Buller claims that he tried to comply as best he could with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.