Jones

Jones v. Jinparn

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20204:19-cv-02817California4,506 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 8 AL D. JONES, et al, Case No: C 19-02817 SBA 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JINPARN’S MOTION TO DISMISS vs. WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND AND REMANDING REMAINING CLAIMS ADAM JINPARN, et al., Dkt. 49 Defendants. 13 Plaintiffs Al D. Jones (“Al”) and John W. Jones (“John”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, bring the instant action against several individuals and entities, including San Pablo Police Officer Adam Jinparn (“Officer Jinparn”), for the alleged mishandling of the remains of their deceased brother, Harleem Sweets (“Harleem”) (aka Steven H. Jones).1 Presently before the Court is Officer Jinparn’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. 49. Having read and considered the papers filed in connection with this matter and being fully informed, the Court hereby…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.