Woolley

Woolley v. Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20203:17-cv-01258California1,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division GEORGE W. WOOLLEY, TAMMY S. Case No. 17-cv-01258-LB

WOOLLEY, ANTHONY LOOK, JR.,

KIMBERLY LOOK, ALEJANDRO MARCEY, and FELICIA MARCEY, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ individually and on behalf of all others MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE similarly situated ORDER 14 Plaintiffs, Re: ECF No. 205 15 v. 16 YGRENE ENERGY FUND, INC., and YGRENE ENERGY FUND FLORIDA,

LLC,

18 Defendants. 19 INTRODUCTION The court assumes the reader’s familiarity with its prior orders, which recount the plaintiffs’ claims that Ygrene and its agents told consumers that the PACE loans would attach to their properties (like property taxes) and, correspondingly, failed to reveal that if homeowners sold their homes or refinanced their mortgages, then they would have to prepay the PACE loans and incur 25 26 27 fees.1 The court certified the plaintiffs proposed classes on January 6, 2020.2 The plaintiff then moved for a protective order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.