Illumina, Inc. v. Natera, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ILLUMINA, INC., Case No. 18-cv-01662-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SEVENTH AND EIGHTH

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTERS

NATERA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 177 Defendant.

14 Having reviewed the parties’ discovery dispute letters, the Court hereby orders the following: 17 1. Illumina’s 30(b)(6) Deponent and Privileged Document: The Court orders Illumina to produce the entire document that refreshed its 30(b)(6) deponent’s recollection because the witness was provided the document during deposition preparation and he directly drew upon it during his testimony. See Dkt. No. 177-3 at 31. Illumina produced a redacted version of the document, revealing only portions regarding patent invalidity. This was improper and failed to comply with the Court’s previous order. Dkt. No. 173. Illumina relies on two cases in support of its position that it need only produce certain parts of the document in question. Those…