Kleinman

Kleinman v. Social Services Agency - Alameda County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20203:16-cv-06961California3,147 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEENA KLEINMAN, et al., Case No. 16-cv-06961-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY - Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 62 ALAMEDA COUNTY, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs filed this civil rights action against Alameda County, the Alameda County Social Services Agency (“the Agency”), and several individuals employed by the Agency (collectively “Defendants”) following years of litigation in state court regarding whether Defendants properly placed Plaintiff David Duarte’s son, R.T., with a non-relative family. Plaintiffs contend that if Defendants had complied with state law they would have placed R.T. with Mr. Duarte’s sister and her husband (the “Kleinmans”) after he was removed from the parents’ care at birth. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are now pending before the Court. (Dkt. Nos. 55 & 62.) Having considered the parties’ briefs and having had the benefit of oral argument on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.