Bey

Bey v. Dimon

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20204:19-cv-07122California1,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIRK BEY, Case No. 19-cv-07122-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

JAMES DIMON, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendants.

Defendant JP Morgan Chase & Co.’s (“defendant JP Morgan Chase”) and JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.’s chief executive officer, James Dimond (“defendant Dimond”) (collectively, “defendants”),1 motion to dismiss plaintiff Kirk Bey’s (“plaintiff”) complaint came on for hearing before this court on January 15, 2020. Plaintiff appeared pro se. Defendants appeared through their counsel, Michael Gonzalez. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendants’ motion WITH PREJUDICE for the following reasons. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges various civil and criminal claims against defendants, including for fraud, refusal to acknowledge entitlement to property, and 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.