Jacobs

Jacobs v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20204:18-cv-04532California1,750 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM M. JACOBS, Case No. 4:18-cv-04532-KAW

Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING CROSS-

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT

NANCY A BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 23 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff William M. Jacobs seeks judicial review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the Commissioner’s final decision, and the remand of this case for payment of benefits. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Having considered the papers filed by the parties, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND On November 15, 2001, Plaintiff applied for disability insurance benefits (DIB) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”). Administrative Record (“AR”) 683. He was determined to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.