McCurdy
McCurdy v. Thomas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES MCCURDY,
Case No. 18-06232 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
L. THOMAS,
Defendant. 16 (Docket No. 15)
17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendant L. Thomas, a physician assistant at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”). The Court found the complaint, Dkt. No. 1, stated a cognizable claim under the Eighth Amendment and ordered Defendant to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 2. Defendant Thomas filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that she was not deliberately indifferent to any serious medical need, and she is entitled to qualified
26 1 The claim against Defendant L. Thomas was severed from McCurdy v. Rivero, et al., Case No. 17-01043 BLF (PR), and filed as this separate action in accordance with 27…