Joseph

Joseph v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20201:19-cv-01294California13,158 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

RHAWN JOSEPH, Case No. 19-CV-01294-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

RECUSE; DENYING MOTION FOR

v.

DISQUALIFICATION; DENYING

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT;

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS;

Defendants.

STAYING IN PART

Re: Dkt. Nos. 48, 49,

18 Plaintiff Rhawn Joseph (“Plaintiff”) brings the instant action against Defendants City of 19 San Jose, City Manager Dave Sykes, City Attorney Richard Doyle, Director of San Jose Code 20 Enforcement Rosalynn Hughey, San Jose Code Enforcement Division Manager and 21 Administrative Hearing Officer Mollie McLeod, Code Enforcement Inspector Sean Flanagan, and 22 Code Enforcement Inspector and Supervisor Jason Gibilesco (collectively, the “Named 23 Defendants”); and Does 1–10. ECF No. 45. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to recuse, 24 motion for disqualification, and motion for default judgment. Before the Court is also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.