Rogers v. Postmates Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD ROGERS, Case No. 19-cv-05619-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
v. Re: Dkt. No. 26 POSTMATES INC., Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Richard Rogers brought this action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act after receiving an unsolicited text message on his cellular phone with a hyperlink directing him to a job board on Postmates’ website. Pending before the Court is Defendant Postmates’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(2). ECF No. 26. Plaintiff filed an Opposition (ECF No. 30) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 31). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the March 5, 2020 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for the following reasons. II. …