Anderson

Anderson v. SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20204:15-cv-02172California1,475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARC ANDERSON, et al., Case No. 15-cv-02172-JSW

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF MARC ANDERSON'S MOTION FOR v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE ON CONDITIONS SET

SEAWORLD PARKS AND FORTH HEREIN

ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

Dkt. No. 509 11 Defendant.

13 This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Plaintiff Marc Anderson’s 14 motion for voluntary dismissal with prejudice. The Court has considered the parties’ papers, 15 relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it concludes the motion can be resolved 16 without oral argument. The Court will GRANT the motion for voluntary dismissal, and it 17 GRANTS, IN PART, AND DENIES, IN PART, Defendant’s requested conditions. 18 The Court shall not repeat the facts or procedural history of this case with respect to Mr. 19 Anderson’s claims, which have been set forth in several prior orders. Mr. Anderson moves to 20 dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Because Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.