Sheahan

Sheahan v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20203:18-cv-06186California8,200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIAN SHEAHAN, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06186-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND

DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH COMPANY, et al., PREJUDICE 11 Defendants. Docket Nos. 70, 72, 90 12 13 Plaintiffs1 filed their third amended complaint against State Farm General Insurance Company (“State Farm”) and three affiliated software companies—Verisk Analytics, Inc.; Insurance Services Office, Inc.; and Xactware Solutions, Inc. (collectively, the “Verisk Defendants”). Plaintiffs’ theory of the case remains unchanged from its earlier complaints. The TAC alleges that Plaintiffs and others similarly situated who purchased homeowners insurance policies from State Farm were injured by inadequate insurance coverage after their homes were destroyed by wildfires. The damage they allegedly suffered resulted from unexpected rebuild costs. This disparity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.