Frost
Frost v. United States
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VINTON FROST, Case No. 19-cv-05365-JD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE DISMISSAL
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.
12 In a prior order, the Court denied pro se plaintiff Vinton Frost’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissed the first amended complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 10. At Frost’s request, the Court extended the deadline to amend by two months. Dkt. No. 16. Frost was still late in filing the amended complaint, Dkt. No. 20, but the Court will allow it in light of his pro se status. The new complaint does not resolve the problems that led to the dismissal of the prior complaint. Frost again focuses on three cases dismissed by other courts in this district and one pending appeal, including Frost v. Steyer, 16-cv-05883-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2016); Frost v. United States Department of Justice, 17-cv-01240-JCS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2017), appeal docketed, No. 19-15579 (9th Cir. Mar. 28, 2019); and Frost v. United States…