Arnold
Arnold v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARIE A. ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-03920-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING METLIFE
v. GROUP, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
THE SECOND AMENDED
METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE COMPLAINT AGENCY, INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 76 Defendants.
13 Defendant MetLife Group, Inc. (“MLG”) moves to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) filed by plaintiff Marie Arnold. The Court held a hearing on the motion on February 4, 2020. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers,1 as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court grants the motion to dismiss without leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND Ms. Arnold, proceeding pro se, originally filed this action against defendants MLG and MetLife Auto & Home Insurance Agency (“MAHIA”) asserting claims for negligence and negligent misrepresentation, as well as a claim under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution…