Optronic Technologies, Inc. v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC, Case No. 16-cv-06370-EJD (VKD)
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE
v. DEFENDANT'S RULE 33(D)
INTERROGATORY RESPONSES
NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 586 12 Defendants.
13 The parties dispute whether defendant Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co. (“Ningbo Sunny”) may respond to plaintiff Optronic Technologies, Inc.’s (“Orion”) post-judgment interrogatories by referring to records, pursuant to Rule 33(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and if so, whether Ningbo Sunny has complied with the requirements of that Rule. Dkt. No. 586. The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint submission and concludes this matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). In its responses to Orion’s Interrogatories Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 16, and 17, Ningbo Sunny relies almost entirely on documents it has produced in…