Wolf

Landeros Jimenez v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20205:19-cv-07996California2,367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MARIO LANDEROS JIMENEZ, Case No. 19-cv-07996-NC 11 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER CHAD WOLF, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Respondents. 15 16 Before the Court is plaintiff Mario Landeros Jimenez’s motion for a temporary restraining order. See Dkt. No. 18. Landeros Jimenez argues that respondent federal officers failed to provide him with a constitutionally compliant bond hearing and should be temporarily restrained from continuing his detention. Because Respondents failed to prove dangerousness or likelihood of flight by clear and convincing evidence, the Court GRANTS Landeros Jimenez’s motion for a temporary restraining order. I. Background Landeros Jimenez is a Mexican citizen. See Dkt. No. 1, Ex. BB at 3. In January 2018, Landeros Jimenez and his brother were arrested in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.