Amy
Amy v. Curtis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AMY, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02184-PJH Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED
RANDALL STEVEN CURTIS, COMPLAINT AND VACATING
HEARING
Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 77
13 Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to file a first amended complaint. Dkt. 77. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 requires that a plaintiff obtain either consent of the defendant or leave of court to amend its complaint once the defendant has answered, but “leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Leave to amend is granted with “extreme liberality.” Chodos v. W. Publ’g Co., 292 F.3d 992, 1003 (9th Cir. 2002). Plaintiffs have filed their motion well within the timeframe established by the court’s Case Management and Pretrial Order. Dkt. 74. The court finds that defendant would not be unduly prejudiced by an amended complaint and defendant’s futility argument is misplaced. …