Sanford

Sanford v. Gudino

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20204:18-cv-01000California6,653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC YLMO SANFORD,

Case No. 18-cv-01000-HSG (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

G. GUDINO, et al.,

7 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 24

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at High Desert State Prison (“HDSP”), filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, which is the operative complaint in this action. Dkt. No. 11. His claim stems from alleged constitutional violations that took place at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), where Plaintiff was previously housed, in April 2017. Id. at 3-4.1 Specifically, Plaintiff alleges an Eighth Amendment claim against the following Defendants at SVSP: Lieutenant J. Stevenson, Sergeant G. Ramey, and Corrections Officer G. Gudino. Id. In an Order dated September 13, 2018, the Court found that, liberally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.