Finjan LLC v. Sonicwall, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE
v. MOTIONS TO SEAL
SONICWALL, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 215, 220, 224 Defendant.
13 In connection with plaintiff Finjan, Inc’s motion for leave to amend its infringement contentions (Dkt. No. 216), the parties filed administrative motions to file portions of their briefing and associated documents under seal. Dkt. Nos. 215, 220, 224. Having considered those motions, the Court grants the administrative motions, as set forth below. There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and documents accompanying dispositive motions that can be overcome only by a showing of “compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178–79 (9th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). …