Cruz

Cruz v. Gutierrez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20204:19-cv-04726California1,465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 19-cv-04726-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER REVOKING LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

v. ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

FILING FEE IN FULL

GUTIERREZ,

Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Deuel Vocation Institution, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 26, 2019. Dkt. No. 1. On January 6, 2020, the Court granted plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 12. The Court then learned that the Eastern District of California had denied plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) based on dismissals of actions in 2014 through 2017. See, e.g., Cruz v. White, et al., 2:19-cv-1518 KJM KJN P, Dkt. Nos. 13 and 19 (E.D. Cal.); Cruz v. Chappius, 2:18- cv-0193 KJM KJN P, Dkt. Nos 42 and 54 (E.D. Cal.). On January 16, 2020, the Court therefore ordered plaintiff to show cause why his in forma pauperis status should not be revoked…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.