Finjan LLC v. Sonicwall, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO
v. AMEND INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS
SONICWALL, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 216 Defendant.
13 In this patent infringement action, plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) moves for leave to amend its infringement contentions. Dkt. No. 216. Defendant SonicWall, Inc. (“SonicWall”) opposes. Dkt. No. 221. The motion was referred to the undersigned judge. Dkt. No. 75. The Court heard oral argument on the matter on January 28, 2020. Dkt. No. 227. Having considered the parties’ submissions and arguments made at the hearing, the Court denies Finjan’s motion for leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND On April 10, 2018, Finjan served its original infringement contentions, asserting infringement of the following ten patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,154,844 (“the ’844 patent”); 7,058,822 (“the ’822 patent”); 6,804,780 (“the ’780…