Adams

Adams v. Manglicmot

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20204:19-cv-07952California5,093 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HERRON A. ADAMS, Case No. 19-cv-07952-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL SERVICE;

DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v. DEFENDANTS

LINA MANGLICMOT, et al., Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, an inmate at California Training Facility (“CTF”), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity, or from an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.