Mireles

Mireles v. Koening

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20204:20-cv-01248California2,758 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RENE MIRELES, Case No. 20-cv-01248-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE v.

C. KOENING, et al., Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, an inmate at Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that CTF correctional officials were deliberately indifferent to his safety, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity, or from an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.