Warner

Warner v. Friedman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20204:16-cv-04345California6,643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

10 On August 2, 2016, Plaintiff, who is a member of the Jewish religion and currently in 11 custody at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), filed his original pro se complaint 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in which he sought enforcement of a settlement agreement reached in his 13 earlier case, Case No. C 11-5039 YGR (PR) (N.D. Cal. filed October 13, 2011) (“Warner I”). In 14 his original complaint, Plaintiff named the following Defendants at Salinas Valley State Prison 15 (“SVSP”): Jewish Chaplain Rabbi Y. Friedman; Chief Deputy Warden A. Solis; Correctional 16 Administrator L. Trexler; and Appeals Examiner K. Kostecky. Plaintiff also named the following 17 Defendants from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”):Chief of 18 the Inmate Appeals Branch R. Manuel; and Food Administrator L. Maurino. Lastly, Plaintiff 19 named the following Defendants from the California Health Care Facility (“CHCF”): Assistant 20 Director of Dietetic A. Rivera; Jewish Chaplain Rabbi Shleffar; Program Assistant of the Acute 21 Treatment Program J. A. Soliz; and Chief of the Office of Administrative Appeals J. A. Zamora. 22 He sought injunctive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.