Arnold
Arnold v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARIE A. ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-03920-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
v. BRIGHTHOUSE LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS
METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE THE SECOND AMENDED AGENCY, INC, et al., COMPLAINT 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 78 13 Defendant Brighthouse Life Insurance Company (“Brighthouse”) moves to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) filed by plaintiff Marie Arnold. The Court held a hearing on the motion on February 4, 2020. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers,1 as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court grants the motion to dismiss without leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND Ms. Arnold, proceeding pro se, originally filed this action against defendants MetLife Group, Inc. and MetLife Auto & Home Insurance Agency (“MAHIA”) asserting claims for negligence and negligent misrepresentation, as well as a claim…