Rasure

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TECHSHOP, INC., Case No. 18-cv-01044-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW,

v. PERMANENET INJUNCTION, NEW

TRIAL, ATTORNEYS’ FEES, AND

DAN RASURE, et al., REVIEW OF TAXATION Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 227, 238, 240, 254, 256, 257, 258

14 Pending before the Court are several post-trial motions filed by Plaintiff TechShop, Inc. and Defendants Dan Rasure, TechShop 2.0 LLC, and TechShop 2.0 San Francisco LLC. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motions in their entirety. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff initially filed this trademark action on February 16, 2018, against Dan Rasure, TechShop 2.0 LLC, and TechShop 2.0 San Francisco LLC.…