Arnold
Arnold v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARIE A. ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-03920-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING METLIFE AUTO
v. & HOME INSURANCE AGENCY,
INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE
METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AGENCY, INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 77 Defendants.
13 Defendant MetLife Auto & Home Insurance Agency (“MAHIA”) moves to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) filed by plaintiff Marie Arnold. The Court held a hearing on the motion on February 4, 2020. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers,1 as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court grants the motion to dismiss without leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND Ms. Arnold, proceeding pro se, originally filed this action against defendants MAHIA and MetLife Group, Inc. asserting claims for negligence and negligent misrepresentation, as well as a claim under the Fourth Amendment of the…