El-Shaddai

El-Shaddai v. Muniz

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20204:18-cv-06879California5,348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

10 Plaintiff, an inmate currently incarcerated at the Deuel Vocational Institution and frequent 11 litigant in federal court, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 12 alleging constitutional violations that took place during his previous incarceration at Salinas 13 Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). 14 Dkt. 18. The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) is the operative pleading in this action. Dkt. 15 20. 16 The parties are presently before the Court on Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s IFP 17 status, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and to dismiss the action without prejudice. Dkt. 38. 18 Also pending before this Court are various pending motions filed by both parties, including 19 Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment (dkt. 33) and his motion to strike Defendants’ 20 motion to revoke Plaintiff’s IFP status and to dismiss the action (dkt. 40), as well as Defendants’ 21 Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Plaintiff’s In Forma Pauperis Status (dkt. 39) and their 22 Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Answer and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.