Pinnacle Ventures LLC v. Bertelsmann Education Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20205:18-cv-03412California3,291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 PINNACLE VENTURES LLC; PINNACLE Case No. 18-cv-03412-BLF VENTURES DEBT FUND III, L.P.; and PINNACLE IV, L.P.,

ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON

Plaintiffs, PINNACLE’S ANTI-SLAPP MOTION;

AND GRANTING PINNACLE’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND

BERTELSMANN EDUCATION SERVICES LLC, [Re: ECF 87] 11 Defendant. [REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION] ____________________________________ AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 14 This action arises from competing assertions of wrongdoing by investors in third party HotChalk, Inc. (“HotChalk”), a privately held corporation that provides education technology and services. Pinnacle Ventures LLC, Pinnacle Ventures Debt Fund III, L.P., and Pinnacle IV, L.P. (collectively, “Pinnacle”) provided debt financing to HotChalk in 2014 and 2015. Bertelsmann Education Services LLC (“BES”) provided additional financing in 2015 and 2018. Pinnacle claims that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.