Hernandez
Hernandez v. Spring Charter Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 GERARDO HERNANDEZ, Case No. 19-cv-01479-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY’S FEES
SPRING CHARTER INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 23 Defendants.
13 I. INTRODUCTION Having settled his disability access claims, Plaintiff Gerardo Hernandez now moves for attorney’s fees and costs. ECF No. 23. Defendants Spring Charter, Inc. and Satnam LLC filed an Opposition (ECF No. 25) and Hernandez filed a Reply (ECF No. 29). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the March 19, 2020 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Hernandez’s motion for the following reasons. II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background After encountering accessibility issues at…