Brooke

facts—namely, defendant’s rebranding and plaintiff’s new office in San Jose, California—still fail to show the alleged injury occurred in California. FAC P 1 and footnote 2. The Unruh Act only || applies to “persons within the jurisdiction of [California].” Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51(b), (f). Plaintiff || is acitizen of Arizona and the alleged harm occurred in Arizona where plaintiff viewed defendant’s || website, so plaintiff does not have standing to bring an Unruh Act claim. Plaintiff was only granted leave to amend her Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim. For the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown, the Court orders plaintiff's Unruh Act || claim STRICKEN from plaintiffs FAC. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19. || Dated: March 10, 2020 Site WU tee TTT TTT

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

15 16

it

Z 18

28