Torres

Torres v. Hansen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20203:16-cv-06607California511 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARIO TORRES, Case No. 16-cv-06607-SI

8 Plaintiff,

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

9 v.

10 MIKE HANSEN, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 Recently, the Court ordered the parties to file case management statements to determine the 14 trial-readiness of this case. Docket No. 122. Defendants filed a case management statement, but 15 plaintiff did not.1 See Docket No. 127. The case file and the case management statement that was 16 filed indicate that this case is almost ready for a jury trial that is expected to last 4-6 days. The Court 17 now sets the following schedule: 18 1. Discovery cut-off: All non-expert discovery must be completed by June 30, 2020. 19 2. Expert witness discovery: No later than July 1, 2020, the parties must disclose any 20 expert(s) they intend to use at trial. No later than July 14, 2020, the parties must disclose any 21 rebuttal expert(s) they intend to use at trial. No later than July 31, 2020, the parties must complete 22 all expert witness…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.