Torres

Torres v. Hansen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20203:16-cv-06607California511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIO TORRES, Case No. 16-cv-06607-SI

Plaintiff,

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

v.

MIKE HANSEN, et al., Defendants.

12 Recently, the Court ordered the parties to file case management statements to determine the trial-readiness of this case. Docket No. 122. Defendants filed a case management statement, but plaintiff did not. See Docket No. 127. The case file and the case management statement that was filed indicate that this case is almost ready for a jury trial that is expected to last 4-6 days. The Court now sets the following schedule: 1. Discovery cut-off: All non-expert discovery must be completed by June 30, 2020. 2. Expert witness discovery: No later than July 1, 2020, the parties must disclose any expert(s) they intend to use at trial. No later than July 14, 2020, the parties must disclose any rebuttal expert(s) they intend to use at trial. No later than July 31, 2020, the parties must complete all expert witness…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.