Shields
Shields v. United States
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 12-cr-00410-BLF-1 Case No. 17-cv-03978-BLF 9 Plaintiff,
10 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SHIELDS’ RULE 59(e) MOTION AS 11 MELVIN RUSSELL “RUSTY” SHIELDS, UNTIMELY 12 Defendant. [Re: ECF 551]
13 14 Defendant Melvin Russell “Rusty” Shields (“Shields”) has filed a “Rule 59e Motion for 15 Reconsideration of ECF-545 Order Denying 2255 and Evidentiary Hearing” (“Rule 59(e) 16 Motion”). See Rule 59(e) Motion, ECF 551.1 The motion is DENIED as untimely. 17 Shields is serving a prison sentence following his conviction of conspiracy, wire fraud, 18 bank fraud, securities fraud, and making false statements to a bank. On January 21, 2020, this 19 Court issued (1) an Order Denying Defendant’s Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set 20 Aside, or Correct Sentence and (2) a Judgment for 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Proceedings. See Order 21 Denying § 2255 Motion, ECF 545; Judgment, ECF 546. …