Ormeno

Ormeno v. Pasha Automotive Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20203:19-cv-07258California3,480 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENRY ORMENO, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07258-VC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PASHA AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant.

The question in this case is whether employees at a cargo processing facility for automobiles at Pier 80 in San Francisco are protected by the City’s prevailing wage ordinance. The answer is yes. I Pasha Automotive Services is a cargo terminal operator that specializes in the shipment of automobiles. Pursuant to a contract with the City and County of San Francisco, the company operates a terminal on Pier 80, which is owned by the City. As discussed later in more detail, the function of a terminal operator is to receive, process, and store cargo at a shipping terminal until the cargo is ready to be loaded onto the ship for transport. Henry Ormeno and Miguel Rivera, employees at the facility, have sued Pasha for allegedly underpaying them in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and San Francisco’s prevailing wage ordinance. The plaintiffs have filed a motion for partial summary judgment, seeking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.