Barajas

Barajas v. Carriage Cemetery Services of California, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20203:19-cv-02035California3,739 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 YOSHIRA BARAJAS, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02035-EMC

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE

10 CARRIAGE SERVICES, INC., Docket No. 65 11 Defendant.

12 13 14 Plaintiffs are three individuals: Yoshira Barajas, Henry Grant, and Nachae Williams. They 15 have filed a wage-and-hour class action against Carriage Services, Inc. (“CSI”). To date, there 16 have been two rounds of 12(b)(6) motions. See Docket No. 15 (motion to dismiss first amended 17 complaint); Docket No. 49 (motion to dismiss second amended complaint). The current operative 18 complaint is the third amended complaint (“3AC”). Currently pending before the Court is CSI’s 19 motion to dismiss and/or strike certain claims and/or portions of the 3AC. Having considered the 20 parties’ briefs, as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and 21 DENIES in part CSI’s motion. 22 I. DISCUSSION 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.