Keith Dean Bradt v. T-Mobile US, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20205:19-cv-07752California2,891 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 KEITH DEAN BRADT, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07752-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO ENJOIN MERGER

PENDING APPEAL

T-MOBILE US, INC., et al., [Re: ECF 69] Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION This case concerns the impending merger of T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) and Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”), two of the four major providers of mobile wireless communications services in the United States. Plaintiffs, twenty-four individual consumers of mobile wireless services, claim that the merger would violate federal antitrust laws. After unsuccessfully applying to this Court for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to enjoin the merger, Plaintiffs appealed the denial of the TRO to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. That appeal is pending. On March 6, 2020, Plaintiffs filed the present motion to enjoin the merger pending appeal. Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.