Keith Dean Bradt v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 KEITH DEAN BRADT, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07752-BLF
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
9 v. MOTION TO ENJOIN MERGER
PENDING APPEAL
10 T-MOBILE US, INC., et al., [Re: ECF 69] 11 Defendants.
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 This case concerns the impending merger of T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) and Sprint 15 Corporation (“Sprint”), two of the four major providers of mobile wireless communications 16 services in the United States. Plaintiffs, twenty-four individual consumers of mobile wireless 17 services, claim that the merger would violate federal antitrust laws. After unsuccessfully applying 18 to this Court for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to enjoin the merger, Plaintiffs appealed 19 the denial of the TRO to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. That appeal is 20 pending. 21 On March 6, 2020, Plaintiffs filed the present motion to enjoin the merger pending appeal. 22 Plaintiffs…