Ketroser
Ketroser v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID B. KETROSER, Case No. 19-cv-05231-MMC
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
9 v. SUBSTITUTE; DISMISSING FIRST,
THIRD, AND FIFTH CAUSES OF
10 7-ELEVEN, INC., et al., ACTION; DIRECTIONS TO MOVANT 11 Defendants.
12 13 Before the Court is Diedre Kellog Ketroser’s (“Ms. Kellogg Ketroser”) “Motion to 14 Substitute,” filed February 7, 2020. Defendants have filed opposition, to which Ms. 15 Kellogg Ketroser has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of 16 and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matters appropriate for 17 determination on the written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for March 18 20, 2020, and rules as follows: 19 On August 21, 2019, plaintiff David B. Ketroser (“Dr. Ketroser”) filed a complaint 20 consisting of five causes of action. On November 7, 2019, Dr. Ketroser passed away, 21 and on November 25, 2019, a statement noting his death was filed. Thereafter, on 22 …