Ketroser

Ketroser v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20203:19-cv-05231California762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID B. KETROSER, Case No. 19-cv-05231-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. SUBSTITUTE; DISMISSING FIRST,

THIRD, AND FIFTH CAUSES OF

7-ELEVEN, INC., et al., ACTION; DIRECTIONS TO MOVANT Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Diedre Kellog Ketroser’s (“Ms. Kellogg Ketroser”) “Motion to Substitute,” filed February 7, 2020. Defendants have filed opposition, to which Ms. Kellogg Ketroser has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matters appropriate for determination on the written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for March 20, 2020, and rules as follows: On August 21, 2019, plaintiff David B. Ketroser (“Dr. Ketroser”) filed a complaint consisting of five causes of action. On November 7, 2019, Dr. Ketroser passed away, and on November 25, 2019, a statement noting his death was filed. Thereafter, on …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.