Collier

Collier v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20204:19-cv-00546California6,562 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

CLAY B. COLLIER,

7 Case No. 19-cv-00546-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

10 SECURITY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 17 11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Clay B. Collier moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the 13 Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which 14 found Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied his application for benefits under Titles II and 15 XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket No. 15.] The Commissioner 16 cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 17.] For the reasons stated below, the court grants the 17 Commissioner’s motion and denies Collier’s motion. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 On March 27, 2015, Collier received an unfavorable decision by an Administrative Law 20 Judge (“ALJ”) finding that he is not disabled. Administrative Record (“AR”) 109-120. That 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.