Chavez

Chavez v. Converse, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20205:15-cv-03746California1,696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ERIC CHAVEZ, Case No. 15-cv-03746-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CONVERSE, INC.,

Re: Dkt. No. 179 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Eric Chavez represents a class of employees, arguing that Defendant Converse, Inc. owes wages for time spent by the class undergoing mandatory security inspections. Moving for summary judgment, Converse argues that its policy was implemented under a good faith understanding of California law and that, in any case, the time spent was de minimis. See Dkt. No. 179. The Court GRANTS Converse’s motion for summary judgment as to Labor Code penalties, but otherwise DENIES the motion. I. Background The factual and procedural background of this five-year-old class action is well known to the parties. Since the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.