Fox

Andina Property LLC v. Fox

Caution
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20204:20-cv-00320California728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDINA PROPERTY LLC, Case No. 20-cv-00320-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO

STATE COURT AND DENYING

LAURA FOX, REQUESTED ENFORCEMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 9

The court is in receipt of self-proclaimed defendant “Tom Hernandez of-the- Ramirez family’s” (“Hernandez”) Ex Parte Motion “for the Enforcement of the Automatic Stay due to the Jurisdiction of the Federal District Court.” Dkt. 9. In it, Hernandez requests that this court issue an order that (1) voids any filing or order made in the San Francisco Superior court action (CUD-19-664902) since this matter has been removed to this court and (2) limits the scope of any order that a state court officer may make pending this action’s maintenance in this court. Dkt. 9 ¶ 8. Based on the underlying state court complaint (Dkt. 5-2 at 4-7), this court lacks federal subject jurisdiction over this action. Significantly, Hernandez is not a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.