Turner

Turner v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20205:19-cv-00693California5,606 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ILLYA S. TURNER, Case No. 19-cv-00693-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

10 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11 ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 16 Defendant. 12

13 14 Plaintiff Illya S. Turner appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 15 (“the Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under 16 Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381, et seq. The parties have filed cross- 17 motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 14, 16. 18 The matter was submitted without oral argument. Upon consideration of the moving and 19 responding papers and the relevant evidence of record, for the reasons set forth below, the Court 20 grants in part and denies in part Mr. Turner’s motion for summary judgment and grants in part and 21 denies in part the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment.1 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 Mr. Turner seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.